Categories

What is Intelligence?

For centuries, people have been trying to define intelligence. However, a universally agreed upon definition proves to be elusive so far. To some, intelligence is the ability to acquire new information and to adjust to new circumstances, while others regard the skills to solve complex problems as more important. Thus, many contrasting theories have emerged. The four theories with the largest number of followers are the theory of general intelligence, the theory of primary mental abilities, the multiple intelligences theory, and the triarchic theory of intelligence.

General intelligence

The oldest theory is that of British psychologist Charles Spearman, who, at the beginning of the 20th century, proposed the existence of general intelligence. He observed that peopleâ??s scores on different IQ tests tend to correlate. In other words, somebody who received a high score on one IQ test usually scored high on all other IQ tests, and vice versa. Therefore, he concluded that intelligence tests all measure one common factor, which he called general intelligence or â??gâ?. In addition to that, Spearman argued that each test also measures some specific ability, which he termed â??s” – vocabulary knowledge or mathematical skills, for example. However, what was of real importance to Spearman was general intelligence, which he believed to be the basis of all intellectual activities.

Crystallized and fluid intelligence

A similar theory by R. Cattell and J. Horn argues that there are two types of intelligence – fluid intelligence (gf) and crystallized intelligence (gc). Fluid intelligence is oneâ??s biological ability to reason and acquire new information. On the other hand, crystallized intelligence is the set of specific knowledge and abilities that an individual has acquired by learning and experience throughout his life (1).

Primary mental abilities

In 1938 American psychologist L. Thurstone suggested, that intelligence is composed of seven independent factors, which he called primary mental abilities:

1) verbal comprehension;

2) verbal fluency;

3) mathematical ability;

4) memory;

5) speed of perception;

6) reasoning skills;

7) spatial visualization (2).

Multiple intelligences

Similar to Thurstoneâ??s theory is that of Harvard psychologist Howard Gardner. In 1983, he proposed the existence of multiple intelligences, which are independent from each other. According to him, everybody possesses a certain combination of the following:

1) Linguistic intelligence;

2) Logical-mathematical intelligence;

3) Spatial intelligence;

4) Musical intelligence;

5) Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence;

6) Interpersonal intelligence;

7) Intrapersonal intelligence (3).

The Triarchic theory of intelligence

Finally, there is the Triarchic (three-part) theory of intelligence by R. Sternberg. According to him, there are three different types of intelligence. The first one is analytic intelligence, which is the ability to reason. It resembles the notion of general intelligence. The other component of intelligence, as defined by Sternberg, is creative intelligence or the ability to draw upon previous experience in order to solve new problems. The last part of intelligence, Sternberg argues, is practical intelligence, which reflects oneâ??s ability to deal with everyday situations (4).

In conclusion, no unified theory of intelligence has been proposed yet. Until that happens, the debates on what intelligence really is are bound to continue.

References:

1. Jensen, Arthur R. Straight Talk About Mental Tests. New York: The Free Press, 1981. 62-63.

2. Intelligence. Encarta Reference Library 2003. Microsoft Corporation, 2002.

3. Armstrong, Thomas. 7 kinds of smart: identifying and developing your multiple intelligences. New York: Plume, 1999.

4. Sternberg, Robert J. How practical and creative intelligence determines success in life. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996.

Cabal Online Completer Skills

8 comments to What is Intelligence?

  • wrhiwigpi w

    How does Artificial Intelligence complicate religious morality and the concept of a soul?
    Assuming we can create a working Artificial Intelligence that is just as if not more so competent as an average human, how would this complicate the soul? I mean how can you think of yourself as meaningful if there is artificial intelligence around? How do you know you are not Artificial Intelligence? For all you know God could just be a computer programmer, and you his creation.

  • Mitch P

    I'd believe he wrote a program then ran it and left it there with his technician staff.

    Edit: Religious people will merely suggest that when it becomes self-aware, God gives it a soul.

    Personally I don't believe that's what the soul is.
    References :

  • Carl W

    The Concept of being self-aware is supposed to be the conclusive sign that you have a soul. If man creates something that is self-aware how can it have soul? that is the main issue among religious people
    References :

  • Ray G

    Perhaps we are. Would that change anything?
    References :

  • jumpingrightin

    AI is a concept for a machine. A soul is a concept for a person. They are not the same thing. You are trying to compare apples to softballs, not even closely related.
    References :

  • banned_glory

    AI would complicate the concept of the “soul” because robots and other forms of AI are suppose to have no soul because they are artificial/fake.

    I would think of myself still meaningful if there was AI around because you would assume you life would be more up their on the hierarchy then a machine.

    As for your last 2 questions I guess anything is possible, but highly unlikely. But thinking like that is how we get movies like The Matrix.
    References :

  • jweston2

    There is no such thing, nor can there be, as everything man creates is according to his own will, not something with its own will.
    References :

  • Andi

    This is a straw-man argument. You assume religion and intelligence are related. If we can create artificial silliness, then maybe we have something…

    Joking aside, fact is that man is composed of both mind and heart.

    The heart is a desire to receive and the mind is the instrument to fulfill that desire.

    It’s the heart that drives man, and the mind finds a way, being to work, to steal, to have money, honor and power and even to the point that he will create a fantasy that a great reward awaits him after death.

    Question is, Can we create an (artificial) endless desire to receive?

    At that point it will be self evolving, because this desire will consume the whole planet, until eventually it will realize what is seeking can not be found.
    References :
    http://www.kabbalah.info/engkab/kabbalah-video-clips/evolution-of-desires

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Security Code: